on betting poker, blackjack and roulette, today I tried again to apply the martingale strategy to 2 games, namely blackjack and roulette.
In the game of blackjack, I managed to use the martingale strategy, but in the game of roulette, I failed to run out of funds after several consecutive losses.
I concluded that it would be easier and more promising to use the martingale strategy in the game of blackjack. if you want to use this strategy in roulette, you really have to have a big budget.
but if my conclusion is wrong, please let me know.
I have also used the maringale strategy in blackjack and roulette, but I use it more often in roulette because it can provide even greater profits.
And as you said, it is true that martingale requires a budget or money to bet more compared to using other strategies, but the amount of money needed can make us get bigger profits than the money we spend.
Maybe there are also a lot of gamblers out there who use this strategy because it has proven to be successful if they can survive and believe they can have luck by winning one of the games.
Of course there is nothing wrong with what you have said and I agree with that.
How come martingale is more effective on roulette while its result is purely based on luck while you can increase your winning edge on Blackjack if you use the standard strategy table plus extra 50% payment for a Blackjack cards which can give you an extra profit once you get that hand during your martingale strategy. I believe this strategy is more perfect on Blackjack because of the extra payment on same bet amount and same winning chance rate compared to other games.