So I stand on neutral ground. Its not really of interest to me but I have nothing against it.
so you don't mind if transaction fees go up. you're still neutral about that? or you're saying that the benefits of having nfts stored on the blockchain outweigh any inconvenience caused to end users such as higher transaction fees and longer confirmation times. it's hard to believe that someone could be completely neutral on the entire issue unless they don't even use bitcoin at all. It already has by way of Emblem Vault which is a method for locking up the contents of a Bitcoin address and bridging it over to Ethereum as a ERC721 token. This means that Ordinal NFTs can be traded on major NFT marketplaces like OpenSea. It works very well, except it is easy to claim your vault holds something it actually doesn't, and thus a lot of scams have happened using that tactic.
Sales of Bitcoin Punks (Ethereum Punks but with an orange background as inscribed ordinals) on OpenSea are through the roof, about 500 ETH in volume in the last 24 hours.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x82c7a8f707110f5fbb16184a5933e9f78a34c6ab/5189380251671771
opensea is kind of playing a gatekeeper role here though. what's stopping someone from uploading the entire bored apes nft collection to the bitcoin blockchain and selling them all by making their own website? probably nothing!