The casino will also not use data on KYC to commit a crime because if they manage the casino properly they can get huge profits so it is impossible to commit a crime by utilizing user data from KYC.
As crypto casinos develop, I am also sure that each of these casinos will also impose KYC requirements on each of their customers in the future.
If you provide KYC data to the wrong casino, there is no guarantee that your data will be safe, like you join a new project but you don't do any research before submitting KYC data. So make sure you provide KYC data for reputable, licensed and trusted casinos.
The implementation of KYC requirements at each casino is due to licensing regulations, so you must understand about the statement and not because the factor of the development of casinos will add KYC requirements in the future.
Up to this point if you still can not understand my previous statement.
It is clear what I said is that it is okay to give KYC to a casino that is trusted and has a good reputation in the gambling industry so it is definitely not possible if I just believe in giving KYC to a casino that is new and doesn't have a clear reputation.
What I mean by a growing casino is where a casino is able to grow and survive into the future so that the casino can become an established and reputable casino in the future and it is true that KYC requirements are due to a license used by the casino so the casino has to ask KYC to its users.
Unfortunately most good casino will demand for KYC and there is no way we can gamble on those sites without KYC. So the discussion of KYC and non-KYC is not relevant at all because if you want to gamble at a reputed caisno, then KYC is something you have to do.
Yes, there may be many new casino's offering us to gamble without the KYC, but then i would call it a risk as we never know if it is even safe to deposit on those new casino and more importantly if they are fair in their games