You are wrong if you think that people wearing casino signatures are also customers
Although I don't doubt that there are people who don't even gamble in these signature campaigns, in most cases they are people who know about gambling.
I for example, in participating in several casino campaigns I registered in the casino, tried it a little and that's it because my thing is poker and I play in fiat sites but I know about gambling. However, there may be people who do not register with the same nickname as in bitcointalk, or who like another casino or who usually bet in a fiat casino.
Or are you telling me that those of you who comment in this thread are not casino customers?
Livecasino.io - 🔥 up to 20% cashback🔥up to 20% rakeback 🚨 instant withdrawalsIn any case, given the level of some of the participants in the stake campaign, I would not be surprised if the ratio of participants who don't gamble is higher in this one.
You should look at what posts from real gamblers look like on a forum.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/ and compare with the BTT Gambling section. There is no doubt that a large majority of posts are made by people who don't gamble and don't care about gambling here. Why do you think there is a thread in Meta section since several months about this issue ?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5403475.0The overall rate is certainly lower than the one of this campaign fortunately, because other campaigns don't give bonuses for posting in this section, and are more demanding on quality, but it remains high though.
To be fair: gambling away your earnings isn't smart. It makes sense that some gamblers join a signature campaign to get more gambling funds. But recruiting campaign participants doesn't happen on Stake, and I don't expect the majority of Bitcointalk users to be active gamblers.
I may be wrong but the main purpose of a forum is to allow people to discuss topics they are interested in, not to allow them to earn money by posting useless content. You certainly don't care about the issue because you don't like gambling, but would you be happy if most users of Bitcoin sections were no-coiners in reality?