LoyceV I suppose not being against it is not necessarily supporting it either, so I just left that quote in the section it was.
My concern is that "cybersecurity" is far too broad for Bitcointalk, there must be better places to find this information. "Privacy", however, is (in my opinion) severely underrated.
I would concur, though it's hard when it would be in the same section as Politics & Society...I don't think there is a topic/board that could ever be as broad as that. I guess another way to put cybersecurity the strength of your infrastructure/system on a network and operating system level. Privacy is the next layer after the network layer. Things become a little harder to understand on the cybersecurity layer though that is one of the main points for it to be included.
While privacy prevents data exploitation, prying eyes etc, it's not enough/almost redundant for one to just be private. One should be at least to the minimal standard, secure as well. Security prevents things like losing funds, accounts being hacked, even prying eyes that privacy measures otherwise wouldn't cover.