Re: The curious case of sticky topics created by authors with negative Trust
Compering Lauda with escrow.ms is only viable with the feedback of their trust page. I don't think the OP was talking about only the feedback page but the whole escrow.ms thing. Lauda banned herself and wanted to disappear with her own will. If she would not decide to disappear then she would still thrive.
Lauda asked to be banned after he was exposed for plagiarism that ruined his reputation, and he is a male but you can call him it if you want.Punishment for multiple cases of plagiarism is permaban so he decided to perform hara-kiri.
I fully agree with you here. It is, indeed, a lot of obsolete information... But this would also imply an entire campaign from administration for revamping all these topics and I am not sure if anyone would be willing to do this entire work. Instead, what I proposed was referring only to a part of the whole which needs revamping, thus being a little easier to achieve.
But we the people (members) can report all sticky topics that are obsolete and outdated, and this is not so hard to accomplish.I am sure we can find plenty of volunteers for this work and for editing or rewriting this topics.
The way DT is these days, it's entirely possible that there could eventually be a - sticky topic on nearly every board. Scammers make DT every month and their inclusions then make DT2 leading to lots of new/old tags that will be visible on trust scores.
DT coalition is sadly on life support. 
My opinion, as long as the information is valid, why mess with it? The easier solution if anything might be to remove trust scores on sticky topics.
Most sticky topics in Beginners & Help section for has outdated information.Imagine recommending someone Bitcoin wallets with topic that was not updated for years, or checking How to earn Bitcoins topic, and this is just a few examples.
Trust feedback is important, but I think it's time to check and clean up all stickies.