You gotta be kidding me. You should read the full statement of Betnomi to easily grasp the situation. To be fair, Bet history is not the problem anymore because Betnomi willing to pay the OP if he will undergo the KYC as standard procedure on dealing with this kind of case. If he has nothing to hide then doing KYC will not gonna be a problem on him besides he can guarantee that Betnomi will release the funds once he finish KYC since Betnomi reps post a statement about this publicly and not honoring it will gonna ruin their reputation.
Just do KYC and move on if you have nothing to hide.
But he can't finish the KYC. Because he doesn't have an official salary/income.
We were fair enough to reverse the decision of the provider to void the bets in the first place.
Your inability to complete the KYC process is what's in the way and nothing else.
So OP's bets were fair. Then why did you accuse him of fraudulent betting?
Some platforms, such as ourselves, have a better risk management system, are familiar with these patterns, and can easily identify them straight away.
Yes, this will age badly.
Best of luck