When you buy an NFT, you do buy the rights to a file, but you could do that just as easily without a blockchain.
The funny part is that an NFT doesn't even do what it says; it doesn't act as an alternative to written contract, because no law protects copyrights according to the blockchain.
Now it's time nutildah tries to ridicule the forum members by saying that "we don't understand NFTs" or "NFTs is the next Bitcoin" or "you're like no coiners".
ISPs don't store the data, and especially don't store it in cleartext.
As I've said in another thread, I don't make legal statements, because I'm not a lawyer, but ethically-speaking, is it just me or you give too much attention to whether a digital file comes in clear text or encrypted? Okay, let's say ISPs store the data encrypted. Would you feel less guilty if you moved illegal files encrypted without your consent? Does this eliminate the ethical concern?