Putting censorship resistance above personal ethics is another thing I like about Bitcoin.
I am all for censorship resistant
peer-to-peer electronic cash. That's what Bitcoin has always stood for; I don't understand why it can't stay this way and we have to expand to this all-encompassing 'censorship-resistant data storage + payments + social network' or whatever else people want to put on top of blockchain.
There are simply way better solutions for achieving decentralized, free data storage, better solutions for decentralized social networks or even digital ownership contracts. Not everything has to 'be on blockchain'.
The very concept of 'blockchaining' everything was contemplated almost a decade ago (and it actually failed). Why go full-circle and attempt it again?