LOL, what a shitshow. [...]
Is Rizzrack willing to give you some Merit or would he commit Merit abuse?

Indeed, I'm waiting for an answer as well but since Rizzrack obviously had a clown for breakfast
I think that Rizzrack just answered you, 1miau:

Defying any decency, he actually
merited his alt! Lol. He just merited his alt after your reply, to show us all his muscles and the fact that he is brave enough for performing also merit abuse.
That's certainly a good example for all users having alts. After all,
seeing a forum official meriting his alt is certainly an example to follow, right?
Since it's currently impossible to prove if coincollector12 is an alt of Rizzrack, only he knows if it's his alt or not.
At same time it's also
impossible to prove it's not his alt.
After all, there's still a possibility: coincollector12 could prove us wrong if he would reveal his main account. Are you going to prove us wrong by posting from your main account?

Even by pointing the finger to an account and saying "that's my main account", that would still not prove anything 100%. For example, you could say that Lauda is your alt account: nobody could prove you wrong as you also could never prove you're right =)))
For sure: undoubtedly, there are sooo many similarities...

Yes, and this is the foundation for believing that coincollector12 is, in fact, Rizzrack;s alt. Rizzrack played a dangerous game here and he lost in the end. What he tried to do was a
reverse psychology: act with his alt in such an obvious way --
like a true alt -- and believing that others would think that it's certainly not possible for coincollector12 to be his alt as he is acting too obvious like an alt for actually being an alt. Does this make sense until now?
So he hoped people would not believe that coincollector12 is his alt because there were way too many coincidences which could make coincollector12 his alt. And having people believe coincollector12 is not his alt because he is acting too obvious like an alt
made him (Rizzrack) actually to use his alt named coincollector12, lol. So he tried to be too smart but ended up as a supporter of scammers.
At same time, he pushed his alt forward, for exposing the alt in case negative tags were to shower him -- and have his alt as
cannon fodder:
Thus the reason I'm posting from an alt account since I'm 100% sure that I'll be painted red, or the least neutral for even blinking at you, and while Rizzrack has been posting from his own account, I'm assuming he's not worried about going into a fist fight with you over the way this thread proceeded since he has a high ranking account
But while trying to show he has balls enough by posting from his main account too he did not actually take into consideration that the situation would end up exactly in the opposite way: so now his alt is clean, while is he proved as supporter of scammers.
Sadly, all we can do (
for now) is distrusting such individuals which, if they were not part of staff, they were painted in red for a long time now.
Yes, scams are
not moderated, according to the rules. Did I get anything wrong from that part? Does it mean that scams are enabled?

Yes, Rizzrack enabled them.
For the second time.It's a really, really big shame for Bitcointalk. Isn't it our job to expose scammers, not to encourage them?
Based on Rizzrack's activity as a
profficient supporter of scammers I'd tend to say that some of them are certainly getting paid for nothing.
This scam is brought to you by .....
I think you left this sentence not ended
