Quote from: Fortify on Today at 09:29:43 AM

It's a meaningless screenshot of a simulator which itself is probably not properly randomized (because it is near impossible to do it efficiently on a computer). If the random number generator has any flaws, they will be amplified over so many iterations, but you can bet that the casinos put a lot more money into their random number generators to maintain accuracy, rather than your most likely free, piece of software. The underlying math is rather simple and doesn't need a simulator to tell you the long term outcome. If you re-ran this simulator another 10,000 and were sure it was re-computing the odds each time, then that would be more interesting to see, but again it is likely to only highlight the flaws in this program's computations and nothing else.

The results found look really unrealistic considering the proportion between maximum winning streak, loss streak, number of total bets and profit made. I don't know how he reached to that final conclusion, but I guess it's possible, considering it was done in a legit way, he had to reproduce the experiment a lot of times, until reaching the results desired, which during a real dice gambling session have tiny chances of happening.