Where did you take all ideas from? About harassment and extortion?
In case you are referring to Lauda, I just said that all she did good for this forum is what you'll never do from 10 alt accounts in 10 years from now on. All the scammers she exposed...!
Then, of course, without knowing anything, you simply throw buzzwords around. But, for the sake of showing what a piece of shit you are I will lose some time now and debunk also this statement of yours:
1. Probably you saw the topic
Lauda/TMAN extortion attempt and,
without reading anything from it, you start to stirr the shit, without realizing that all you do is simply covering yourself in shit.
2. Of course, you also did not read the archived topic mentioned in the OP of the thread linked by me above:
https://archive.is/szqRf#selection-501.0-501.70. Meaning the one used as a basis for accusation.
3. If you actually search for that topic inside the forum, you'll see that liar Zeroxal deleted his accusation and moved the topic to Archive board, for making sure nobody ever finds it again:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1759607.0. Yet I found it.
4. Of course, you also never cared for reading
Lauda's signed message, explaining what that shit was all about. To be more precise, it was a
sting operation and
in no way an extortion attempt.
If that was an extortion or a blackmailing, then Lauda were banned. Yet this did not happen. Why, dipshit? Would you answer why? Let me tell you, because you are just a piece of shit throwing buzzwords around, for impressing those naively reading just your posts and not the entire context:
Lauda was never banned for extortion / blackmailing because there was no extortion nor any blackmailing involved.
All that happened was that Lauda was demoted from moderator position, as the way she acted -- meaning this
sting operation -- was certainly not a good nor a wise thing to do. Yet, if theymos would have considered her an extortioner or blackmailer, he would have banned her since then. So stop throwing buzzwords around!
5. Furthermore, TMAN was also never banned for extortion / blackmailing (highlight is mine):
there was no blackmail - have you read the PGP message? if you had you wouldn't be in here. this is an assault from QS a proven scammer against Lauda I happened to of been involved as I was the one who bought the suspicious activity to light.
no extortion was taking place - it was an intel gathering exercise that backfired.
that is of little consequence now as all the evidence is in Place - I am awaiting return contact from moderators to discuss
Why was that? Again, because there was no extortion / blackmailing.
6. Even furthermore:
proof above - if lauda was extorting for money then where is the payment address?
7. Lauda's
profile shows a Marketplace Trust score of +
35 / =17 / -
6. That's more positive Trust than you'll have in your life. From those 6 negative feedbacks,
3 are related to her vanishing.
Besides, by reading all feedbacks she ever received,
there is no feedback from any reputable DT user stating anything about any kind of extortion / blackmail. Again, how can you explain that?
I'd go even further but I know it's for nothing, as you don't read anything and simply show up here to eat some more shit.
Still funny as heck though, seems I got a negative trust rating from the newsletter guy also, thus proving my point, why posting from an alt account. But go ahead though, tell me more how he's not abusing the trust system however fits his teenage girl dramas.
The negative feedback is justified by your doxxing-oriented actions. Such actions make me not trust you at all regarding any possible kind of deal and I wrote that in the feedback. This is what
Marketplace Trust was implemented for. On the other side, you don't understand anything from this system, thus you wrote me a retaliatory feedback which only proves how imbecile you are. You acted just like saxydev or other morons, which react with retaliatory feedbacks (
without understanding that (1) their feedbacks are not even show on someone's profile, as they are only shown at Untrusted feedback section; (2) their feedbacks have zero value). Now
this is Trust abuse and misuse of Marketplace Trust system -- meaning to write retaliatory feedbacks.
Addressing the negative feedback I gave you, even if it doesn't have any impact on your profile since I'm not on DT, it is 100% accurate, since you support someone who tryed to blackmail and extort another user here based on NOTHING, some "investigation" Lauda took it upon herself to hold, thus you are more shady than half the people you accuse here on this forum. Lauda was imediatelly demoted for this, her account was flagged, none of you wanna be ass lickers called him/her out on it, cause during that time you were too busy kissing ass cheecks left and right to make your way through the Bitcointalk rankings.
Lauda and co took it upon themselves to be judge jury and executioner, and when Zeroxal proved the source of his bitcoin holdings ( though it's wild he had to do an AML for Lauda ), bitcointalk's "Justice League' backed down. Sadly Zeroxal should've went to the police/authorities with the extortion attempts against him, but since the guy had quite big amount of bags, I'm assuming more or less he didn't want to get authorities involved to protect his privacy same way you don't want to meet up.
Even if the story behind the PGP key was legitimate, it is still wrong in 100 different ways and ILLEGAL the way they went about it. But the PGP key could also have been an "alibi" in case the obvious happened and Zeroxal went public with the extortion attempt, which it did!
But like I said, you're just on overachieving ass licker with morals that work only when you decide them to.
You deflect any feedback that's thrown to you and doesn't paint you in a good light. You are literally more shady than half the people you accuse here on bitcointalk.
This is the funniest shit you've said so far, considering this is the exact way you're going about all of this, but hey you know that old romanian saying " Thieves scream thieves", that sums you up just right.