Be careful in regards to going 100%, even in bitcoin. 

You need to be able to make sure that you can cover your expenses, including emergencies.. so usually for the vast majority of peeps (normies) and even non-normies, it is not a good idea to go 100% into anything (especially when we are in a transitory period like this, and also that bitcoin constitutes way less than 1% of the word's population's adoption.. and even way less than 1% of the monetary and monetary derivatives values.. not even accounting for the likelihood that bitcoin is quite likely going to continue to increase the size of the monetary value pie in the coming years.. for perhaps more than 200 years into the future and longer) unless you have some very exceptional circumstances.


I have some practical differences of opinions (and tensions) regarding the concept of companies as being people or even having the same rights as people.. so the starting premise is not a comfortable one for me.  I do understand that legal fictions are created around companies, so I don't really have any problem with that..

Bots are scary, no?  Surely they can be used for good to empower people but it would seem our main values need to be attached to human values, even bitcoin seems to have had retained some ability to be attached to human values, even though there is a lot of ways that king daddy seems to not be attached.. so these surely are questions and tensions that likely are going to continue to exist and persist in bitcoinlandia.. in regards to how much bitcoin is affected and/or controllable by "we" here peeps.

I am not going to claim to know the answers to these kinds of questions... even though I recognize and appreciate aspects of the tensions that seem to exist... including but not limited to number go up.. ....

And, hey by the way, recently, I had been thinking about some of the seemingly guttural objections to inscriptions and ordinals on bitcoin, and some people have been arguing that cry, cry, cry, inscriptions/ordinals take away from bitcoin because bitcoin is supposed to be money and blah blah blah, even satoshi said that bitcoin is supposed to be money... and the fact of the matter is that bitcoin is and always has been more than money.. it is a kind of information transmission system that includes the ability to include value.. so whether we call that money or not or we say that inscriptions/cardinals are not sufficiently money enough seems to be lacking in imagination that pretty much bitcoin has always allowed for the transmission of information and including the various kinds of ways that incentives are attempted to be imbedded that should allow the market to figure out what kinds of things people (normies or whatever) want to send or try to send (including becoming part of the permanent record) over the bitcoin blockchain (timechain) that will likely to be cheaper to be sending and attaching these kinds of dickbutts in earlier times and likely more expensive as the bitcoin system continues to grow and more adoption happens.. and too bad so sad that dickbutts are getting included to be a permanent reflections regarding what some people/normies/or weirdos want to transmit in current times, and sure it seems that bitcoin allows that no one can stop them from being able to send whatever information and value that they are able to afford to send, even if some people believe that these kinds of value (or lack of va