As for me, it's absolutely incorrect to compare BTC with BFG or any other token. At least you don't take into account the fact that BTC trades with a huge daily volume on multiple centralized exchanges and, as a result, can be volatile. At the same time, BFG trades on just a few exchanges, and I'm more than sure that most people buy BFG tokens only for staking on the Betfury platform, not for speculating with it on DEXs or CEXs.
I also agree with your statement, apart from the fact that Bitcoin has more than 10 years of history, and has gone through multiple stages of the market, that includes accumulation, trends, distribution and that already says a lot about it, on the other hand, the BFG token? You can't even do reliable technical analysis because it's been like a big buildup, a bomb, and then another rally? but that is the normal behavior of a token, you have to inject liquidity, but obviously I understand that right now is not the time, however it is incorrect to compare the token with Bitcoin. The token will rise if and only if Bitcoin rises in price, and we will have to wait and see if it complies.
I would say that even if you do not want to compare the two together, we could at least say that it has been doing well by that comparison. It's not about "is it better than even bitcoin?", sure bitcoin is better and it will always stay better and there is nothing wrong with that. However, it also means that we are talking about BFG being such a great coin that we could at least try to have a comparison.
I believe that BTC is better than BFG but that doesn't make BFG bad, it makes BTC great and BFG good, which means you could invest. In this situation if you put 100% of your money into BTC that would be wrong, diversification is important and you could diversify by buying some BFG, and some other coins of course.