In the game of sports, winners are always categorized based on the team with the highest performance. For example, in English football (EPL), Arsenal Football Club and Manchester City are seen to have good tactical skills, making them stand out as winners in each of their games. Therefore, a gambler establishes trust in those teams because they have won almost 88% of their games. The gambler stakes high on each of these teams because they believe that the money invested in each team will bring out good returns.
The same thing goes for when a gambler wants to stake on players. They must know the performance of that particular player before any trust can be established. For example, Harland of Manchester City is known for goal-scoring, and Saka of Arsenal is known for good finishing. This is how trust in gambling is established, although this trust sometimes fails.
My question now is, As a gambler would you give 100% to a stake that you trust?
As a gambler anything I want to bet I always pick does teams in good form and stake on them because of my trust in them, despite I know that bet is by lucky, I don't stake on teams that I don't see their potential, so i always bet on teams that I think they have high possibilities of winning and forget all about lucky at first and that is seriously helping my winning.But i a hardly stake on players performance because they can carry injuries anytime on pitch or even lose form, so i always see it as big risk to stake on that.
I can never give 100% on any stake with whatever trust I may have on a team and that is why I don't stake with big amount of money.