Re: [overview] DT1 Positive & Negative Strength Statistics
⭐ Merited by LoyceV (6)
More charts after remembering how to use SUMIF and COUNTIF equations 
Arguably more useful than any of the others imo, as focuses on the overall trend of DT1 positive/negative strength over the past 4 years, as opposed to individual members statistics.
Included 50, 100 & 200 Week MAs and "power trendlines" where I felt it was relevant
One thing I will say is compared to 2-3 years ago (Weeks 50-100 in particular), there are now many less excluded DT1 members. At the high it was 15/100 and now is back down to 5/99. Likewise the amount of total negative strength was more than -80 at it's highs, whereas now it's currently less -20 with an average of around -40. So does this mean DT is working in the way it was intended, or the opposite?
It seems statistically speaking DT1 data has "balanced out", ie creating and maintaining averages after a lot of volatility in the early years, whether that's a good thing or not...
Arguably more useful than any of the others imo, as focuses on the overall trend of DT1 positive/negative strength over the past 4 years, as opposed to individual members statistics.
Included 50, 100 & 200 Week MAs and "power trendlines" where I felt it was relevant
One thing I will say is compared to 2-3 years ago (Weeks 50-100 in particular), there are now many less excluded DT1 members. At the high it was 15/100 and now is back down to 5/99. Likewise the amount of total negative strength was more than -80 at it's highs, whereas now it's currently less -20 with an average of around -40. So does this mean DT is working in the way it was intended, or the opposite?
It seems statistically speaking DT1 data has "balanced out", ie creating and maintaining averages after a lot of volatility in the early years, whether that's a good thing or not...