@Ratimov, your report has been handled. So this case seems to be closed, it must that is be a good catch.
To be honest, I did not send any report, I just created a topic and nothing more. Then, after a while, I went to the forum and farlack was already banned.
Someone other than you may have reported it and the admin found an old report which was then taken care of. It's just that the moment coincided.
For those who think that farlack is banned because of his dubious signature and false admin: the reason for his ban is not that he tried on the role of an administrator. He is a longtime ban evader, the evidence was presented 2 years ago:
Yeah, I'm just not used to dropping into those threads and probably missed them. But thanks for showing the real reason clearly. Admin took the right moment to ban farlack, so now everyone should know why.