DCA does not work with shitcoins.

There needs to be a presumption of underlying value...  meaning that in the longer term the price will be higher than it is today... which usually, I would like to consider long term to be 4-10 years or longer. .and it seems to me that no shitcoin, including but not limited to doggie coin has a life expectancy that is likely to endure at least 4 years for one thing or to have a decent probability that it's price four years from now would be higher than today's price.


I suppose that it does do the trick..


You fuck.

...

I am wondering if there are any other proof of work coins..  I suppose that I could google it..    Any BTC spin off coin would be proof of work.. BSV and BCH.. but whatever.. this is hurting for my head to even think about other possible proof of work coins.. even though they seem to be diminishing. .and like you mentioned not profitable.. even though some of the miners, like uie pooie will mine anything.. so I understand that there is a certain amount of neutrality as long as you believe that it is bringing in more dinero.. .. and I suppose that having a Sha256 algorithm makes for easier switching between coins versus if the shitcoin were to have some other mining algorithm..?  I am not really too schooled on the topic, and not sure how interested that I am, either..


I kind of feel like I am looking in the mirror.. for whatever that's worth.


Maybe you and Phil should team up?  As butt buddies.

 


So, I am gathering (perhaps erroneously?) to the extent that any of this matters in the whole scheme of thingie-ma-jiggies that you cannot use the same equipment set-up to switch back and forth from mining BTC to mining those two above-referenced POW shitcoins?