-snip-
That's why I told that (It's based on overview article).
Most the time, keywords, review and other aspect for the answer. So, the list is not 100% correct and some of "site-casino" is included. Need to be listed by our self as well, since the data is from internet too.
The data is from the INTERNET only. Not sure what is the algorithm behind fetching those results but definitely it could not be validated just like that. We should really have less dependency on such results or questions which are vaguely answered based on what "others" have written somewhere on a blog site or review site for that matter.
Thanks for this, and it just shows that,
[...]
Not only missing from the list but the list provided is not accurate, Bitvest and many on that list are not on-chain gambling sites, all I know is that on-chain gambling sites it is a smart contract based and you need to connect your wallet, and meta mask is widely used on this, on chain gambling are decentralized, those sites mentioned are centralized and you are under their Term Of Service.
This is one of the times that AI could go wrong.
AI is one technology that takes up a lot of human building blocks to give accurate results. Yes, it is evolving and far more advanced than what we had last week or before that. However, the reliance on its results is solely based on the write-ups or sometimes gibberish keywords connected with poorly written articles.
Yes, Bitvest along with LuckyBet are not really based on on chain. Luckybet apk is mostly designed to work with local data hosting and also majorly focuses on sports betting. Takes very small help from the on chain algo.