⭐ Merited by LeGaulois (3)
I understand your point
But I only said that I will consider the request if I receive it. It doesn't mean that I am going to share any data. In fact, all the information about mixing sessions is deleted after mixing is completed, so there is nothing to share.
But I only said that I will consider the request if I receive it. It doesn't mean that I am going to share any data. In fact, all the information about mixing sessions is deleted after mixing is completed, so there is nothing to share.
@Sinbad.io (or Mehdi 
)
Hello,
I would like you explain the following point because I find it a bit ambiguous.
Wired.com sent an email to you. Basically, it was to talk about the funds coming from the north korean's hacks. (the $10-15 million sent to your service)
You explained your point of view about privacy, and that was a good one.
But you also said this:
To snitch or not to snitch.
The sentence I posted basically means you're not sure if you will do it. And you need 'to investigate' to decide if you will do it
The bitcoin mixers industry is based on trust. Am I supposed to trust a service that could potentially report something to LE.
Don't take it wrong, but your opinion is ambiguous
)Hello,
I would like you explain the following point because I find it a bit ambiguous.
Wired.com sent an email to you. Basically, it was to talk about the funds coming from the north korean's hacks. (the $10-15 million sent to your service)
You explained your point of view about privacy, and that was a good one.
But you also said this:
Quote
In case I receive a request from [Chainalysis] or any other institution I will investigate the matter and make my opinion on it
To snitch or not to snitch.
The sentence I posted basically means you're not sure if you will do it. And you need 'to investigate' to decide if you will do it
The bitcoin mixers industry is based on trust. Am I supposed to trust a service that could potentially report something to LE.
Don't take it wrong, but your opinion is ambiguous