Advertising or even using the service doesn't mean you're using it illegally.
I know, but can you trust regulators nowadays? Remember what happened with that Ethereum mixer this year? Just a friendly reminder that even self-custody is a red-flag for intergovernmental organizations:
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Updated-Guidance-VA-VASP.pdfThis site though expects the community to take the responsible approach and not encourage or support users who would engage in the advertising of money laundering activities for their own benefit.
You're going to have a hard time convincing this board, me included, that enhancing Bitcoin privacy effectively, cheaply and in a comfort manner is trifle in comparison with it being used as money laundering in some cases, and in a negligible manner.
first off i can assure you using chipmixer is a way to be tagged as a suspect in money laundering.
any USA citizen or Bahama citizen is asking for trouble using chipmixer.
ftx = big fucking money lost.
I for one am glad i do not and have not ever advertised or used a mixer of any kind.
just look how NY made a new no mining law just the other day.
How would you feel if your governement makes a no mixer law and backdates it so that you have to explain your involvement as an advertisement service for them? and user of their service as you just admitted to.
not saying it will but read up on new york and what they just did to miners.
And don't say I did not warn you all.
Is this a real seizure?
I for one am glad I never sold my signature to them.
Now I hope all that did and there are many that did on Bitcointalk don't get in trouble.
Edit I added this below:
I never used any mixer based on the idea that it was a way to get in trouble from governments. ie as some mentioned a honey pot
I don't want anyone that was on the chipmixer campaign here on Bitcointalk to get hurt hopefully it all passes over.