Mixers are not prohibited by law.
In the US, a money transmitter license is required as mixers are classified as a "money services business." No mixer has one, as far as I know...
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1574581/download18. Based on my training and experience, I am aware the Bank Secrecy Act requires
anyone who owns or controls a money transmitting business to register with the United States
Department of the Treasury. See 31 U.S.C. § 5330(a)(1). I am further aware that federal
regulations issued pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act define a money services business, which
include money transmitter(s). 31 C.F.R. § 1010.100(ff)(5). Money transmitters are defined
broadly to include anyone who accept(s) . . . currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for
currency from one person and . . . transmi(ts) . . . currency, funds, or other value that substitutes
for currency to another location or person by any means, as well as [a]ny other person engaged
in the transfer of funds. 31 C.F.R. § 1010.100(ff)(5)(i)(A)-(B). MSBs are required to register
with FinCEN, a division of the Department of the Treasury, unless specific exemptions apply. 31
C.F.R. § 1022.380(a)(1). MSBs are required to establish and maintain anti-money laundering
programs, to detect and report suspicious transactions, and to collect certain records of customers
and customer transactions. I am further aware that bitcoin mixers or tumblers such as
ChipMixer are considered to be MSBs under federal law. See U.S. Department of Treasury
FinCEN Guidance, Application of FinCENs Regulations to Certain Business Models Involving
Convertible Virtual Currencies, FIN-2019-G001 (May 9, 2019), at 19-20.
Sorry to put it so bluntly but anyone advertising a mixer that doesn't have this license is advertising an illegal business (if the business is servicing US-based customers, anyway).
Funny, its actually been the case since May 2019, but either nobody here knew this or the ones who did never said anything about it.
Not saying the forum administration needs to make changes either way, but individuals participating in mixer sig campaigns should at least be aware of this.
You could use the same analogy for people who have casino signatures. Online gambling is not legal in a lot of places.
On that note, how many casinos that people were wearing sigs for cut and ran with peoples money vs mixers?
How many mixers had / have complaints against them for taking seizing peoples funds vs mixers?
As for the amount of data, 7tb is a lot until you figure that the blockchain is 500+gb 2 copies of that and you are at over 1tb