Even though you consider the framework and/or the likelihood to carry out some kind of a plan like you had proposed, we have seen plenty of on the grounds data to describe that you would be able to live off of something like $300 per month in several places and to even be comfortable with that.  Yeah, of course you described a hypothetical in which you share costs with other guys, and even though I don't have any problem with that.. I really doubt that it is necessary to share with other guys once it came time to execute.. and yeah, maybe you need to increase your monthly amount to higher amounts.

Many of us who had been born in a western country have had a lot of advantages, even if we consider ourselves to be living pay check to paycheck and even if in our earlier years while we are building up our investment portfolio nestegg we are going to do better if we can defer gratification by cutting costs and attempting to increase our income in order that we are able to save and invest, and surely something like bitcoin gives us a lot of potentiality to reach our goals to be able to secure and to transport our wealth when the time comes to start to deploy it.. such as in a relocation situation.  Earn and save our money in the west and then spend in the lesser income places.

Even with your forum registration date, if you had been saving up bitcoin for the past 8 years with an investment of $10 per week, then you would have saved $4,180 and you would have accumulated a bit more than 3 BTC, which even if that might not be a great amount, it is surely on the road to accumulating a lot of wealth... So yeah, maybe you can up your game to $100 per week since there is really no meaningful/significant evidence that bitcoin is a worse investment than it would have been in early 2015 - even though there is significant/meaningful evidence that bitcoin is both a likely better investment with a stronger investment thesis, and maybe, given the ways that prices are going up and supply chains are getting fucked an other ways that there are uncertainties in the world, then probably it would be best to be putting at least $100 per week (and more if you can) into bitcoin rather than the $10 that might have been the whimpy justification from 8 years ago.

Once your bitcoin is worth around $500k, then you likely would be able to perpetually get a passive income off of that value for around $1.7k per month, which is well enough to both live well in a lot of places around the world, likely has a decent amount of future proof and cushion contained therein.  Even if my December 2021 projection of fuck you status (using $2 million) was a wee bit too optimistic,^** it still seems to be quite possible (from my perspective) that you likely do not need as many bitcoin as you might believe that you do) if you are able to move to a lower cost living area, and getting to a moderate fuck you status that is around $500k in value rather than $2million in value may well be reachable in a couple more bitcoin cycles (4 years-ish per cycle).   Yeah of course, anyone who had been investing $100 per week since early 2015 would feel a lot better compared to someone who might have had only been investing $10 per week.. and it seems kind of defeatist for anyone to actually know about bitcoin and not to be able to come up with some kind of an aggressive/assertive plan that does not overdo it... because some people end up getting reckt when they overdo it rather than figuring out and employing a sufficiently aggressive and assertive plan that does not devolve into gambling.. and there is a need to do something rather than to just expect to get saved by not doing anything.. and no one is going to save you but yourself, especially if you are able to set aside value in an aggressive manner and if you are only able to do $10 per week, then so be it, but if you are more fortunately able to do larger amounts such as $100 or even $250 per week then the aggressive/assertive will likely have good chances of paying off better (and no guarantees, for sure).


**I have been thinking that at some point I need to change the curve on my my BTC bottom price projections (especially regarding the 208-week moving average as the BTC bottom price) in that chart in order that the UPpity curve becomes quite a bit more gradual with the passage of time.. so likely I will get more inspired at some point in the future when I get time to do it and I come to believe that there is some need to update such chart.. and really any of us can still do some extrapolation of the chart in order to figure out how to lower the expectations a bit... but yeah, maybe it would be better if I plugged some new numbers and new formulas in there .. (a graduated curve rather than straight-line curve) ,... even though the fact of the matter remains that even the historically (and unprecedented) low BTC prices that had gotten around 35% below the 200-week moving average.. and largely still remain below the 200-week moving average have still not caused the 200-week moving average to start to curve down.  In other words, the 200-week moving average continues to slope upward, even if it is more flat than its historical levels, relatively speaking.. just barely going up in recent times.