I think the banking contagion is now over.
Many sources credit the ukraine-russia conflict as being responsible for economic instability and asset contagion in the world.
If that is true, is there a scenario where economic instability ends without the ukraine-russia conflict being resolved?
If a poll was conducted where people of the world were asked what the number #1 leading cause of economic instability was, I wonder what source most would hold accountable? I have not seen any anger or negativity directed towards Putin or russia as being responsible for these issues. If such is a major trend in america, I have not seen much evidence for it.
At present, there appears to be a large disconnect between narratives published by the media and public opinion. As time passes, this disconnect appears to be growing larger and more pronounced.
Whatever official sources and experts are saying. Fewer and fewer people appear to be accepting their message over time. Which is an interesting scenario.
It is true that many sources hold the Ukrainian-Russian conflict responsible for the economic instability and contagion of assets in the world. The conflict has created geopolitical uncertainty and tension, which could have a negative impact on the global economy.
The general question that arises Will economic instability end without a settlement of the Ukraine-Russia conflict??
I think there are several possible scenarios carried out by the parties where economic stability can be restored without a full resolution of the conflict. such as diplomatic resolutions, lifting of economic sanctions, diversification of energy sources and economic resilience.