A very well articulated and thought out post. I am surprised the FBI and/or any other agency showed zero interest when members from the forum were it seems lining up to inform them of theft related to sums around $1 million. I understand the point about Bitconnect advertising but when you look at how yahoo62278 put forward another perspective it might or might not have implications. Time will tell I suppose.
The FBI isnt going to come after signature wearers. They dont have the time or resources first off. Secondly, those who advertised for CM didnt have access to internal protocols, so how could they have known. The FBI went after the major promoters of bitconnect, but didnt attempt to contact anyone underneath them promoting the obvious ponzi. They want those in charge, who were in the know.
In the collectibles world here on the forum theres been an attempt to contact the FBI and other regulatory bodies over essentially theft by a coin maker that is likely well over a million dollars ..weve been turned away and sent on a wild goose chase left and right to try and get some legal body to just listen to whats going on. If its that hard to get someone to investigate a million dollars + in fraud, does anyone really think theyll go after CM signature wearers who werent aware they were promoting an illegal business.
I Remember when bitconnect ads were all over YouTube
the most obvious ponzi in a long time. Problem is google is more powerful than the FBI, as the US allows for massive corps to fund political campaigns all they want , which means politicians are mostly just bought puppets, who can (and do) tell the FBI to leave certain companies alone. Its the biggest joke in the US governmental system that this is still allowed.