-snip-
I'll assume the reason you are ignoring my points yet again is because I am right and you have no satisfactory answer.
If you use Wasabi, then the only coordinator with any volume is the coordinator which is run by the same people, and is anti-privacy and pro-censorship.
They are rejecting a source of good revenue by blocking those transactions.
They are protecting their revenue by implementing blacklists, not reducing it. If they are unable to run a censorship-free coordinator, then the correct thing to do would be to shut down their centralized coordinator and work towards setting up decentralized ones. Instead they opted to enforce the nonsense that is "taint" and attack bitcoin itself to protect their own income stream.
I'm asking you what your concern is regarding Wasabi since Wasabi is specifically designed to defeat chain analysis businesses
Wasabi is specifically designed to defeat chain analysis businesses, and we do that by sending your money directly to them to pay for their services. Lmfao.
Your keys, your coins, you decide how to spend them, and there's nothing anyone else can do to stop you unless they have more than 51% of the Bitcoin network hashpower.
Or you use Wasabi, and then we will stop you coinjoining them because our blockchain analysis buddies spied on you on our behalf and told us that you are very naughty!
It is abundantly clear that you are part of Wasabi's team, and you have no desire to actually address our arguments but rather just repeat the same old nonsense talking points which have been thoroughly debunked on here, Twitter, Reddit, etc., many times.
Wasabi/zkSNACKs is pro-censorship, anti-fungibility, and anti-privacy.