Re: WasabiWallet.io | Open-source, non-custodial Bitcoin Wallet for desktop
Yawn. Since I've linked to my post where I point out definitive proof of Wasabi's address reuse twice, and you've ignored it both times, I'll just quote it here for anyone else reading this thread to look in to themselves.
Here's an example thread: https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586249382097088512#m
Gets shown address reuse, claims it isn't from 2.0 and that it has never happened in 2.0. Then gets shown address reuse from 2.0, and says they've already patched it. How could they have patched it while also claiming it has never happened? They are lying somewhere.
Here's another example: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872#m
And dozens more: https://nitter.it/wasabistats
But the devs don't care, because apparently some address reuse is "acceptable": https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586321068129939456#m
Even Bitcoin Core devs are aware of this: https://nitter.it/1440000bytes/status/1611713687123030017
But good job of sticking to the party line of just outright denying it and gaslighting anyone who points it out.
Any other privacy matters that may have surfaced lately?
Wasabi has been reusing addresses, a lot, which has resulted in a lot of post-mix coins being linked back to pre-mix coins and being de-anonymized. And then the devs have been on Twitter, both defending that it is "acceptable" and also lying about it entirely.Here's an example thread: https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586249382097088512#m
Gets shown address reuse, claims it isn't from 2.0 and that it has never happened in 2.0. Then gets shown address reuse from 2.0, and says they've already patched it. How could they have patched it while also claiming it has never happened? They are lying somewhere.
Here's another example: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872#m
And dozens more: https://nitter.it/wasabistats
But the devs don't care, because apparently some address reuse is "acceptable": https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586321068129939456#m
Even Bitcoin Core devs are aware of this: https://nitter.it/1440000bytes/status/1611713687123030017
But good job of sticking to the party line of just outright denying it and gaslighting anyone who points it out.
What am I being accused of outright denying?