or this reason the requirement of NO KYC becomes the main pillar of demand for players in casinos.
But if there is no KYC then how to solve the problem of money laundering? For money laundering, the casinos will be responsible if there is no KYC then it will be difficult to trace the user, as a result, all the responsibility will be upon the casino. And also there will be a question regarding the abuse of bonuses and so on.
there is no other way besides KYC, maybe according to people KYC should be reserved for gamblers who play with big money in casinos while small gamblers are not required if indeed to overcome money laundering it is also impossible to play with small money, maybe that's what many people complain about, So far big gamblers who play big money probably don't have a problem with this KYC thing
If they use big money to gamble and it turns out they are using gambling as a place to launder money, they object to KYC and will take issue with it.
Especially if there are new members who have just joined and immediately used big money to gamble, the casino suspects them and asks them to do KYC.
So casinos don't want to take the risk if there is illegal activity at their place so they can just ask the new member for KYC directly.
If you are new to the casino, it is better not to use big money right away and try to be patient to continue using small money to gamble.
I think the casino will also see your journey in playing gambling at the casino so they won't ask you to do KYC.