It depends on where the crisis took place for instance if it is in a developed country, we can say bitcoin can be a saving grace but in a developing country like mine, I don't pray for any because if it happens to hold bitcoin can't have any advantage over fiat other than you are sure your investment is secure.
Holding BTC doesn't have any advantage in a time of severe crisis, it does not matter the place the crisis took place, it could be in the United States or in Kenya, whether a developed or an underdeveloped country; people just do not think about BTC when they have lost family, friends, relatives, neighbours, etc. In a time of crisis the thing to do is to worry about those who were affected in the disaster, and not to think about the advantage of holding BTC. Fiat is even easier to spend than BTC, and it may have more advantage to have than BTC in a time of crisis.
While people care and think about their loved ones in the time of crisis, some people also do think about their money too,
what would be the safty and the value of their money in bank during this crisis and even how to get it out ,but if you're someone that has some of your funds stored in Bitcoin you will be less worried, and a bit more in advantage than someone who has all his funds in the bank . Take for instance the current banking crisis we have in the United States and Nigeriaw where people got restricted to access their funds, and inflation as result of war in Russian and Ukraine.
when a crisis occurs, the main thing to do is continue to survive, limit withdrawals from banks, so that investing in crypto also experiences sluggishness, because it seems that they are interrelated. but if we switch to crypto during a crisis, maybe it will be safer, because at that time the price will experience bearish, so that the future will be better.