Re: staff were asked to stop advertising mixing services
⭐ Merited by bitmover (2)
But these points are valid for other services:
- What guarantee is there that a casino doesn't close and scam all its users?
- What guarantee is there for any service that is advertised to state that it has privacy, and not actually does not?
Just a comment on this, Comparing a casino running away to a potential money laundering case is not that rate . The weight of crime for laundering is enough to seize the forum compared to a mere casino that usually protected by their ToS in times that they need to shut down. They just simply need to declare bankruptcy. What reason can a mixing service use for a potential laundering?
I don't know if you know, but casinos are one of the best ways to launder money.
Either way, the observation I made, on the issue of scams, not illegality. Casinos or any other service that is advertised here may later turn out to be a scam. We have no way of predicting this.
So I say that the reasons that eventually led to this decision are not intended to be a scam, but potential problems with the authorities.
Casino has a KYC policy for AML if you are not aware. Casino has a legal defense mechanism which they actively caught money launderer while mixer services protects the customer privacy. I hope you knew what's the big difference on the issue that you point out.
I'm not actually pertaining on the scams but on the laws being violated on the services that we are discussing. Mixer doesn't screen if the transaction is from a launderer or not since their service is for privacy purposes. This is the grey area that they are talking about. Gambling on the other hand has a license to operate.