or this reason the requirement of NO KYC becomes the main pillar of demand for players in casinos.
But if there is no KYC then how to solve the problem of money laundering? For money laundering, the casinos will be responsible if there is no KYC then it will be difficult to trace the user, as a result, all the responsibility will be upon the casino. And also there will be a question regarding the abuse of bonuses and so on.
It beats my imagination more often than not whenever I see gamblers kicking against KYC on online gambling sites and it makes me wanna ask does such persons has illicit intention or what that KYC becomes his major problem compared to losing his money through unfair act from online casinos cause tis is what genuine gamblers should burden themselves with more.
Like Shasan asked, how do you go about tracing an issue of financial crime used through your site by a customer if such gambling site make no use of KYC? Maybe some of us don't know what many of these online casinos go through in hands of the authority behind the curtains just to keep business moving then maybe this thread might clear a few things
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5445505.msg61940945#msg61940945Traditionally, the kyc should not exist in any casino that has cryptocurrencies, because that is why cryptocurrencies exist to be anonymous, so as not to realize who is playing, in a casino that uses FIAT money if all the KYC that is wanted is already It knows that there are certain rules that have existed, but it is known that governments want to be part of this technology, and since they cannot, because the only way is through kyc, I do not see any other way for a government to enter a crypto technology , since there even so with the kyc they will not be able to have the same participation, and all the anger is focused in that direction.