Update. Nevertheless, I will tell you what I think about the Finnish question. The year of the special operation in Ukraine clearly showed that NATO suffers from impotence and does not have the potential to resolve the conflict by force in the confrontation with anyone more serious than the partisans from the banana republic.
Would you say Russia hasn't been able to resolve the conflict with force either?
Remember, the conflict is not resolved. And Russia has been using force, for over a year.
It's also been more than a year since you said this:
The active part of the operation is designed for at least three weeks, do not forget that Ukraine is the largest country in Europe, after Russia. Then, for several more months, it will be necessary to clear the area from gangs with rich historical traditions of Bandera. Do not confuse the desire to minimize civilian casualties with weakness.
And more than a year since you said this:
Ukrainians will be fighting Russian aggressors to death.
Well, that means they'll die. Yes, Captain Obvious, aggressors will die. That's the whole point.
In Kyiv on May 9 2022, a traditional parade will be held in honor of the victory of the USSR over Nazi Germany. It is naive and foolish to doubt it.Seems like you got duped again.
You are probably right, the Russians fired six uninterceptable hypersonic missiles at a non-existent bunker. What a ridiculous and stupid show of force. 
Perhaps the target was a bunker that wasn't a "Nato Command Center". Is that a possibility you considered or no?
Maybe NATO doesn't even a command center with dozens of NATO officers in a non-NATO country that's been getting shelled for the past year since that would make them an incredibly valuable target for Russia.