I have nothing against hunting bounty cheaters. But, Imagine I am doing such a thing to get a trust inclusion from the DT network.
I don't see a problem if someone who hunts cheaters on the forum is included in the DT, as long as they use their feedback correctly. In my opinion, this is why the trust system was created - to fight against scammers and cheaters. Isn't it?.
Imagine I added someone to my Trust list, and they did something stupid. After that, Someone will create a thread and mention us, and they want me to explain why I added them to my trust list.
If you add someone to your trust list who doesn't use the feedback correctly and other forum members point it out, you can simply review their arguments and make any necessary corrections to your trust list (as cygan did in this case). So, where exactly is the problem?
I see some prominent forum members have cleared their trust list. So, I let my trust list be empty and did not bother to make any changes as I wanted to see default feedback.
OK, let me get this straight. You rely on feedback from DT, but if no one on the forum is willing to contribute to creating a trust lists, how do you expect DT to function? Just imagine what would happen if all reputable and honest members deleted their trust lists.