or this reason the requirement of NO KYC becomes the main pillar of demand for players in casinos.
But if there is no KYC then how to solve the problem of money laundering? For money laundering, the casinos will be responsible if there is no KYC then it will be difficult to trace the user, as a result, all the responsibility will be upon the casino. And also there will be a question regarding the abuse of bonuses and so on.
Well yes, I understand the point, but those who launder money are also not that stupid, they know that currently a casino is not the way to do it, on one occasion some people approached me saying that they had government credit cards and that they wanted to Withdraw that money, it was money that they could not withdraw, I told them that this is a lie, a government has other ways of laundering money, using credit cards or "scratching" them is not the solution, I think it is analogous to As for the casinos and the KYC problem, as things are now, the best way to launder money is to do it in cash.
Well, nothing compared to how Pablo Escobar did in his time, who always put the money where he wanted before the authorities of the USA and the whole world, where they weighed the money separately and that was his way of accounting for it.
I agree with @shasan's statement that if casinos don't ask for KYC how can casinos detect their customers using money laundering budgets, whereas licensed casinos usually require KYC due to demands from licensing companies.
sure, casinos are not the right place to divert money laundering funds, but it can happen whenever they want.
right now we think that gamblers are not stupid using money laundered funds in depositing casinos, but we don't know the truth and I'm sure they must be smarter.