Just because it's cheap for usage doesn't mean it should be found in every corners of the globe. This is because of the he potential danger and threat it pose among nations in the international arena as relating to power tussle. Nuclear energy despite it's environmental friendly advantage is believed to be linked with nuclear weapons and this raises a high degree of restrictions to it's build up .
Environmental friendly?
Should we ask the former occupants of Chernobyl if it's really Environmental friendly?

I think people just choose what they call Environmental friendly and what's not Environmental friendly because they are not directly affected but if we are to go by strict standards, even the so-called Green Energy stored in Lithium batteries is not
Let someone convince me how the process of attaining the raw materials for the manufacture of Lithium somewhere deep in the Democratic Republic of Congo is Environmental friendly.
