He was managed Derby County, but he doesn't make any change. Without any achievement, then he managed Chelsea, nothing change again. He managed Everton, still nothing change.
Lampard is only have a privilege since he was a veteran player in Chelsea, that's make people respect him and he already have a good relationship with Chelsea, but as a coach he's absolutely bad and nothing we can expect about him.
Lampard is only good to become a temporary manager, if Chelsea already find a good manager, he can become an interim manager or just kick him out.
Lampard is not a good coach, I can call him average at best. He has the modern day coaching mentality, that's why his team try to play well, but he's not tactical in any way. I think he should just stick to the lower leagues or a mid table team.
In all the teams he has coached there have not been any significant difference.
His first season at Chelsea, he was decent, given the fact that the team was under a sanction that made it impossible for them to sign any new players, but after then he was just awful. He is very similar to Potter, but a little better. They both manage to make their team look busy but they actually do nothing with the ball.
After sacking Potter, if Chelsea have managed to get a good coach, they would have stood a better chance against Madrid because even Madrid is not in a very good form but instead they went with Lampard. I still struggle to understand how the management of Chelsea don't see that as a bad decision.
Well, lets hope he can surprise me and prove me wrong.