I'm a contributor.
Would it have been hard to start with that? Since you are you obviously have a vested interest in them doing things the way they do you are going to presenting a certain view point that not many other people here share.
You have that backwards, when someone contributes, that changes the way they do things.
I've mentioned it before but there's no reason I should have to start the conversation with that, the things I am saying are true regardless of whether or not I strive to make improvements to Wasabi.
I'm a contributor.
Since it's been proven that Chainanalysis is not accurate a lot of the time, in both directions, at the end of the day using it to do any form of censorship / blocking is pointless at best. As soon as it allows any 'tainted' (which is a BS thing anyway) coins through, even if it's a legitimate mistake, since there is no way to track them after that anything else coming though that coordinator is now 'tainted' since you can't know who got what.
-Dave
If that's the case, then a different WabiSabi coinjoin coordinator will end up with the liquidity that was marked as a false positive taint. Why don't you run a coinjoin coordinator yourself to capture this market share that the default coordinator does not want to accept?