I already proved you were lying about being able identify the outputs of a WabiSabi coinjoin, remember?
I have already shown you blockchain evidence of the following:
Wasabi coinjoins creating outputs which can be 100% linked to a specific input:
https://mempool.space/tx/dae13b2d015587a3033d7ab7949a7efa6d6ed7aa782168b0651ab37a2d8390f8Wasabi coinjoins reusing addresses, leading to users being doxxed:
https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872Wasabi coinjoins using the same address on both sides of a transaction:
https://mempool.space/tx/af50a27691c0f0b7b626cddb74445a0e26bb6ed7b045861067326ea173bc17d0 (address bc1qft2uze947wtdvvhdqtx00c8el954y6ekxjk73h)
For you then to provide a single example which works well does absolutely nothing to address the fact in many cases Wasabi coinjoins are critically flawed. As per my previous analogy, a car manufacturer showing a new model which works well does not excuse previous models which have randomly burst in to flames. This is an incredibly simple concept, so I can only assume you are trolling by continuing to deliberately misunderstand it.
Again, you are repeating a malicious lie. Wasabi users cannot be surveilled because their wallet addresses are masked by client side block filters and their IP address is masked with Tor.
Yes yes, you've repeated this meaningless soundbite a dozen times now.
You pay a blockchain analysis company for information on every single UTXO which attempts to register for a coinjoin. You are complicit in mass surveillance.