How are JoinMarket coinjoins superior to WabiSabi coinjoins?
Apart from funding mass surveillance, reusing addresses and identifiable outputs as mentioned above, JoinMarket coinjoins are also not in the fate of one authority. It's meant to be decentralized, whereas in Wasabi there is just one coordinator with the overwhelming liquidity.
Yeah, I said "Bitcoin UTXOs", there's nothing you needed to clarify about my statement
I do. You think that the UTXO is the currency. The currency is one property of the UTXO, not the UTXO itself.
I didn't deliberately misunderstand, your claim was simply wrong:
My claim wasn't wrong. I don't know the moral history of the inputs I sign when making a CoinJoin, I don't know the people who own the inputs, I'm neither supposed to spy them nor to look on their blockchain history. I'm only looking for liquidity to obfuscate mine.
Items can be considered fungible if any single unit has the same market value as any other unit without further inquiry about its origin, destination, or unique attributes.
So claiming your project makes the currency fungible is false, because you will never accomplish this goal if you deny certain UTXOs; if some are not allowed, then there will always be some coins whose history can be identified. You only want to conceal the history of the units you approve, not the history of all units, so you will never achieve making it fungible, according to your definition of fungibility of course.