Software doesn't run on intentions
Coordinators apparently do. I don't question Wasabi wallet for being bad software per se, I question the intentions of the developers who run the coordinator, which I must comply with if I need to use it. You make it sound as everything is transparent, while that's false. I have absolutely no manner to verify which outputs you consider inappropriate, and according to which standard.
Since Wasabi is a non custodial wallet, there is no way to prevent users from sending to an address twice.
But Wasabi picks addresses automatically. Is this correct?
Now that you have confirmed the answer to your question was "No", answer my original question:
Not yet. I haven't done my analysis to this. I generally don't spend hours on verifying every privacy-preserving software. I just stick with tested, peer-reviewed software, running in a decentralized fashion, and avoid pro-censorship and anti-fungibility software which is subjected to arbitrary ethic rules, and whose developers outright lie in front of me. It's a good tactic, and it has worked so far without issues.