So use a different coordinator or run your own
Or just not use their software altogether as an indication of disrespect for their dishonesty towards me, and for being so arrogant to think they are ethically superior.
What point do think you prove by purposely sacrificing your privacy by not using the most private transaction type that has been discovered so far? You can be censored by Joinmarket coordinators who are using chain analysis companies and there's no way you could even detect it, so why are you using Joinmarket?
As a maker in Joinmarket, you can't verify the standards of the coordinator either.
With the exception that JoinMarket is a coordinator market, and if one decides to enforce arbitrary nonsense they'll overtime stopped being selected? And you probably meant a taker, not a maker. Makers are the coordinators.
I guess you just simply have no idea how Joinmarket works either. The taker is the coordinator of the coinjoin, not the maker:
https://github.com/openoms/bitcoin-tutorials/blob/master/joinmarket/joinmarket_private_flow.md#the-taker-roleEach client does, yes. This will obviously cause address generation collision if the same seed is used on two clients asynchronously, since the clients are not aware of the automatic activities performed by each other.
So what you're arguing is that wasabistats is a liar, who wants to destroy your reputation.
Yes, I proved that wasabistats is a liar who wants to destroy the reputation of privacy software:
https://twitter.com/Kruwed/status/1642612625883164672And that every address he has been posting is deliberately used in multiple devices to pretend Wasabi is flawed software. Correct?
Obviously, since there were no address reuse bugs found in the open source code:
https://github.com/zkSnacks/WalletWasabi