Your link doesn't show the same link as the ones referenced in the posts above.
@Stalker22 is there blockchain evidence that ties GoldenView to these other alts?
I did some digging, but I could not find any blockchain evidence that ties GoldenView to those other alts. It appears to be a false positive.
Sorry about that, @GoldenView! I have edited the reference post and removed the tag from your profile. Moving forward, I recommend that you tag the accounts you come across using your links or social media profiles. This will help investigators and campaign managers to avoid such misunderstandings in the future.
As you can see even we can overlook an item and a person will be incorrectly tagged as has happened here. This is why newbies and Junior members are banned from posting investigations because they make this mistake more often than not.
This link:
uncovered that one extra post of yours that proved you posted the term first.
In saying that
We have a new number twelve:
12. Zeshan275
Proof:
https://ninjastic.space/search?content=waris363naeeskera really does use the term first:
Proof of Authentication Post
Bitcointalk Username:Soka1
Bitcointalk Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3435324
Discord Display Name:@waris363
Campaign Category Participated:REDDIT, TWITTER,INSTAGRAM,video
BSC Wallet Address: 0x8510940439AD3Cf8Df68F06f47b26375AfD9b91F
https://ninjastic.space/post/59192087Zeshan275's post: (the entire post has been deleted)
Zeshan275 has been tagged by @CryptopreneurBrainboss as having multiple alts, so it's unlikely to be a false positive there either.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5384578.0;dt - @YOSHIE is the authorCampaign section (Twitter): list of fraudulent account names.
1. Zeshan275
2. sujonreza
3. Dopping
Accounts Connected:
1. Zeshan275
2. albert69
3. Protocolgashtahai
Miscellaneous:As these UID's are tied to the others above, they are all guilty of ban evasion.