Re: Why Banks are called as Manipulator tool of Investors 2 Control us not our Money
So how about we stop with the matrix and that wanna-be pimp of yours and simply let people spend as they see fit and if they want to buy a tinfoil hat be it, if they don't and they want to buy the nicest car they can afford because you only live once then let them! All this hate against spending is just commie propaganda from the ones that can't afford it, stick with arranging your own life before deciding how others should live, and remember where we are, bitcointalk!
My keys, my decision what I do with my coins!
Good point and I support all the ideas in your comment as a whole. We cannot blame the banks because they support spending, as they are not responsible for the consumer decisions of individuals. The rise in consumption rates is mainly linked to the improvement in the income levels of individuals and the extent to which they are affected by calls for more consumption.My keys, my decision what I do with my coins!
However, I would like to point out that it is permissible to discuss the consumer system as a social and economic phenomenon at least, which allows it to be criticized from different angles. Capitalism created societies with a consumer culture using propaganda and with the support of banks to facilitate spending. If this is a system of deception, then the banks certainly contribute to it.
Investors are behind all this for a simple reasons, that their large funds, means billions of dollars kept on banks. Once they put in or out, it would cause a large gap or fluctuations in price.
Price of what?
