You also missed this post somehow:
OK well I'm prepared to concede that it matters more whether a post is spam rather than if it was written by AI.
...
The general consensus is we can't report posts for simply being AI; they have to be spam first and foremost. As far as trust ratings are concerned, spammers should only be neutral tagged at most.
Whats absurd is assuming any negative action would be taken against you for this result. Let's look at the results for your post from 5 detectors (its not long enough to be used by 2 of the 7 I listed
here):
Writer.com: 47% human
gptzero.me: "Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human"
contentscale.ai: 100% - Highly likely to be human
writefull.com: 77% AI
paraphrasingtool.ai: "It's likely that a human wrote this text"
It would therefore not be rational to conclude that your post was written by AI.