actually I disagree I do James Joyce stream of conciseness on purpose and I have done it for years.
I am not familiar with the concept, but I can figure it out based on this sentence of yours I quoted. You overdid it a bit, though. I don't remember seeing such posts from you. At least, not to that extent.
Nevertheless, you don't qualify as a shitposter, stream of consciousness or not.
I would argue any correction made via a google search or a spell check simply does not need to be listed as a source.
Of course not. Google suggests corrections based on its dictionary anyway.
So if I write all of the above and ask an AI to polish it up am I cheating?
It's a delicate matter. I would say both yes and no. First of all, a shitposter doesn't know about stream of consciousness or James Joyce. Your average Bitcointalk shitposter doesn't know much about bitcoin or crypto either. The fact that you know and can switch between the two styles as desired removes all doubts. Doubts that didn't even exist.
Not every use of AI is immediately plagiarism. I see no problem in having an AI, Google Translate, Grammarly, or something similar correct the mistakes
YOU WROTE. It's a problem if you ask the AI to create something for you because you can't write it yourself and then you present that and take credit for it.