.....
Now that's the problem because every gambler, even though they don't like KYC and uses a minimum amount to deposit or withdraw, they chase big wins.
If they manage to get a big enough win, they will automatically be asked by KYC to withdraw the winning money.
So I actually have the assumption that avoiding KYC is a difficulty in the future.
If KYC is really needed and can really provide convenience, I won't mind as long as the casino I use has a good reputation and can be trusted.
And I will object because KYC almost always brings inconvenience to those who are going to gamble using cryptocurrency.
And yes!
Sudden KYC, when a player wants to withdraw the money won, also in cryptocurrency, by the way, is always an unpleasant surprise because a person’s joy from winning can quickly turn into even greater and more unpleasant disappointment if the player did not plan or simply cannot disclose his personal data to the casino. This is no longer a win, but a loss of the “winner”, because he will continue to play (after all, money cannot be withdrawn from the deposit without KYC, and he cannot pass KYC!) and will most likely lose all this winnings.
It turns out some kind of senseless garbage in such a game in a crypto casino.
I know what you mean and I really respect the opinion that you have conveyed because the choice not to give KYC to the casino is your full right, friend.
But if you get a big win and the casino asks you to provide KYC so you can withdraw the winnings it's not exactly a difficulty for you where you have to choose between maintaining anonymity in a crypto casino or taking all your winnings but with KYC.
Personally, if the winnings are big enough and commensurate, then giving KYC for that amount of money is not a loss for me.
But it's true what you say that the unreasonable rules set on cryptocurrency casinos who initially say they are non KYC.