I don't think using AI generator is plagiarism...
Of course it's plagiarism. Plagiarism tools might not detect or classify it as such, but AI-generated content fulfills both conditions to be considered plagiarized.
1. You are using text that doesn't belong to you and which you didn't write. A bot wrote it.
Really? But I stand to be corrected if I'm wrong. So how about bloggers who pay content writers on Fiverr to write a full blog post to be posted on their news blog. Will you consider that as plagiarism? Because they actually didn't write the content, but rather paid someone to do that for them?? (i.e following your definition of plagiarism)
2. You aren't posting a source from where or what you got the information from.
That's why it's plagiarism.
But I think for the fact that I had no source and can't be found anywhere on the web online is a reason it ought to have been non plagiarized content, because I'm kind of curious to have someone break this down.
Because I think the difference between plagiarized content and non-plagiarized content is that while plagiarized content has an already existing online source, non-plagiarized content has non.
Or do we have any contrary difference about this???