Depending on how you're planning to do it, those rules cover it. It's better to report those posts.
Uh.....yeah. This is as far as I've gotten in reading this thread, but I'm going to be consistent and reply before I finish.
If you have a thread started with a question like "what's the best hardware wallet?" and and the first response from a member is the most comprehensive comparison of all the hardware wallets out there with a detailed description of each one, there's no question in my mind that the following replies will be half garbage and half commenting on whatever.
It is a multi-layered problem.
If only all first replies were constructed as carefully as that, then there would hardly be a visible spam problem, as any userscript can just filter all spam from Page 2 or reply #10 onwards or something.
Spam wouldn't exist if it wouldn't be profitable.
WORD UP.
I've been watching some videos about this stuff lately, and sweet satan is it scary as hell. I think we're all fucked in about five years.
Well since we are on bitcointalk.org, it is possible to make some incentive for campaign members to post a well constructed and detailed (non-AI generated) as the first/second/third reply of a question thread, and that will teduce the amount of spam people have to wade through to find an answer ultimately.
But I'm not a campaign manager, I am a "hacker", and thus I must work with what I have.