⭐ Merited by MarjorieZimmermanGinger (1)
This is about your 60th post where you've incorrectly referred to ordinals as an "attack."
While I do agree that NFTs should not be seen as an attack, I hope you understand Ordinals became a feature by mistake. Is it really mistake when default verification of Taproot script (see BIP 342) intentionally remove limit (such as 10000 bytes script size limit) which exist on previous script type?
I think it would've been better for Ordinals to live on a Layer-2 scaling solution such as the Lightning Network just to avoid adding further pressure to the main Bitcoin blockchain. Maybe nodes/miners will ultimately reject transactions with Ordinals inscriptions for the good of the network itself? I really hope BTC stays cheap and fast to use (sort of) for day-to-day payments. Otherwise, it'd become completely unusable. No one can predict the future, so we can only hope for the best. Just my opinion 
But until now, NFT on LN (with protocol such as RGB and Tro), NFT on sidechain (such as RSK) or Ordinal data stored else-where (such as side-chain layer and BitTorrent) are mostly ignored by people who are NFT enthusiast and own some Bitcoin. I expect this thread will continue as long as NFT enthusiast prefer storing their data (image, audio, etc.) on-chain or there's very user-friendly to make NFT on LN/side-chain.