Aren't you the same person whitelisting them back to the forum now? how many of those users became a big part of the forum well I don't expect you to answer
Sorry Op for going off-topic
I don't know why but I feel like you are trying to trigger him (good try). None of them are paid jobs. He is doing it voluntarily and he is not responsible for what they do after. Most of His whitelisted users doing good. He often posts the Ban %. If you are trying to trigger him, I am sorry but he is unlikely to pay attention to you as he proved himself as a thick-skinned gang leader.
We were just having a chat and he felt it wasn't the proper place because it was a little off-topic from the OP, I simply made my perspective plain to him, it's nothing personal, and BTW, we're still on the same track. Leave it to the moderator to decide and quit pressing.
I have to ask out of curiosity, and due to my own thread on the issue, which AI detectors are you going to use, and how are you weighing the results? Are there different levels of likeliness, or will it only post replies in threads that come back as "highly likely" to be AI-generated?
I use at least three different AI checking websites. Or more than three if even one of them doubts that the text is not completely AI-generated. I do not use the GPTZero website - I had too many false positives with it.
This is somewhat preferable to the previous plan, but my concern is what would happen if everyone disregards the JAPI response and proceeds with their discussion regardless of whether it was generated by AI or not, similar to this post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5448187.msg62145641#msg62145641. Since there are currently no explicit forum rules against AI and no 99% proved AI detector tools, nobody appears to care and the moderator won't lock a thread just because JAPI says so. there is a light at the end of the tunnel but the challenges looks bigger.